Nile - Amongst the Catacombs of Nephren-Ka
Relapse Records, 1998
Genre: Death Metal
1. Smashing The Antiu
2. Barra Edinazzu
3. Kudurru Maqlu
4. Serpent Headed Mask
5. Ramses Bringer of War
6. Stones of Sorrow
7. Die Rache Krieg Lied Der Assyriche
8. The Howling of the Jinn
9. Pestilence And Iniquity
10. Opening of the Mouth
11. Beneath Eternal Oceans Of Sand
When I first heard of this band’s arrival on the scene I felt they would probably shed some serious intelligent light onto the blasé lyrical conceptions portrayed in most Death Metal releases. Not to mention the musical arrangement concept of performing Egyptian Death Metal was immensely intriguing to me. I was hoping for flowing Arabic guitar scales flowing up and down the fret boards of the guitars, coupled with an intensity Death Metal could only be known for. However, I think what the public received is mostly a Harmonic Minor scale on the guitar, instead of the hundreds of scale work devised by the Arabic culture within their own music. If you are truly searching for that “pure” middle-eastern feel then I would recommend Orphaned Land. However, their devotion to God may put some metal fans at an uneasy spot of purchasing their albums. However, if the music is all you care about then
I will first tackle the musical accomplishments of Nile, for they are far more impressive than their historical knowledge. “Amongst the Catacombs of Nephren-Ka” as a Death Metal album is an incredibly well done masterpiece in my opinion. However, when we beat our heads against the wall attempting to find the Egyptian Death Metal aspects it is very small indeed. If this were not an attempt at Egyptian Death Metal, then I would say this is a creative wake up call to the Death Metal genre. For the creation of the songs and riff writing is nearly un-matched. Furthermore the guitar work is exceptional, fast paced when necessarily and broodingly slow at other junctures. The skill with which they play is also quite incredible,
The album launches you into a Death Metal blitzkrieg with “Smashing the Antiu” an inherently Egyptian sounding title; however, I cannot find one touch of an Egyptian song structure throughout the song. It is merely a superb Technical Death Metal song and that is all. “Opening of the Mouth” at points had some passages reminiscent of an Egyptian sound here and there. However, other than that I did not find anything inherently Middle Eastern about the structuring of the songs. Do not misunderstand me, for the songs are quite superb and I highly recommend listening to this CD, but if you are expecting a highly intelligent and well thought out conceptual piece, you will be as disappointed as me. One of the most stand-out and interesting parts of this album is the song “Die Rache Krieg Lied der Assyriche.” The song title is undoubtedly in German, and since Assyriology played a large part in German scholarly sectors in recent times. I see no problem in quoting a title. However, it was really
This brings me into discussing the lyrical content of their so called “Egyptian lyrics.” Now I read an interview with Karl Sanders around the time this album was released and I remember him stating that some of the lyrics used were Sumerian. Now I was at first greatly curious about this because a book on Sumerian linguistics is quite difficult to track down. I have merely found a book on the Akkadian, which is quite extensive, and archaeologists have a full alphabet for. The last I had heard was that the Sumerian language was still a broken language within the archaeological field, so to see a Death Metal band writing their own lyrics in Sumerian would be quite impressive indeed. Now the Akkadian language is derived from what linguists have called “Common Semitic.” I conjecture that this may have been Sumerian, for the writing styles are almost identical, using cuneiform as the primary writing aspect. Now that broke into West Semitic and East Semitic, East Semitic broke into Eblaite and Akkadian. The city-states of
As you can see language is an interest of mine so imagine my surprise when I saw a song title such as “Barra Edinazzu.” I couldn't identify this language for the life of me. It clearly wasn’t Egyptian, in fact very little of the foreign languages used throughout this album are not Egyptian. Some words and phrases are, but most are not. So I took a closer look at the lyrics to “
The
Necronomicon’s perversion of Sumerian does not stop at linguistics alone, but
the belief structure they would have you believe is so erroneous it makes me
want to hit something. There are various
parts of the Necronomicon that wholeheartedly piss me off. The first that stood out to me was a
numerological aspect in the title “Supplementary Material to 777.” The number 777 is related to Judaic lore and
is the number of God. If you are pulling
aspects of a Sumerian time-frame then using a representation of God makes no
sense. Furthermore the Sumerians used a sexagesimal number set. However, the number seven was greatly
important in to the Sumerian culture; often time’s ritualistic aspects had to
be done seven times. This is most likely
why in the development of Judaism the number 777 was represented as God. Labeling a deity with numerical
representation is not new and the Sumerians did it as well. However, the Necronomicon tries to make you
believe that they got the number system correct. Sometimes the Sumerians would write the names
of their deities in the form of numbers such as Samas (pronounced ‘Sha-mash’)
whose number was 20. Now the
Necronomicon actually did get this aspect correct, but when it comes to the
number 30 the representation for Sin, the Necronomicon states it is the number
for Nanna. This brings me to wonder what
else is inherently erroneous about the Necronomicon. Now why Nile
chose a book that presents erroneous information about the Sumerian’s I will
never know. For a band that should have
spent their time focusing on Egypt
they seemed to use a lot of the “Sumerian” aspects.
Now
another aspect of the Necronomicon that really makes my blood boil is how it
bases a lot of truths around Aleister Crowly and H.P. Lovecraft, two writers of
fiction. Granted both men were into
occult magic, but it was not Sumerian.
There’s in fact a chart of comparisons on page xxxix of the Necronomicon
which compares all three, Lovecraft , Crowley , and Sumer . This does nothing but increase my belief that
this perversion of Sumerian is nothing but a joke in terms of the
Necronomicon. The first thing I notice
is Cthulhu, whose number is 666, and in Sumer should be referenced as
Ctha-lu or Kutulu. Now I’m looking
through my book “Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia.” I can’t find reference to this Kutulu person
anywhere. Nevermind symbology related to
him or the number 666. Now I know the
number 666 in the Torah was related to Lucifer because of his imperfection (see
my review on Blut
Aus Nord ’s
“The Work Which Transforms God” for further reading on this). I can indeed locate some of the names within
but as far as the symbolism of some aspects is completely incorrect. For example, the Pentagram, which in most
religions has become a pretty important aspect, especially in the form of a
Pentacle. Now it says that it is derived
Plough Sign in Sumerian, which it says “the original pentagram and sign of the
Aryan race.” (Necronomicon, pg.
xxxix) Now will someone please kindly
inform me where in the bloody hell the Aryan race comes into play here? First off the Sumerians did develop the
symbol of the swastika and it was used very rarely in their culture. However, as an Aryan representation for Arabic
peoples is the most preposterous thing I have ever heard. The swastika wasn’t even derived from a plow
symbol. The symbol for a plough in
Sumerian doesn’t look anything like a pentagram either (see Figure 3 on Page
102 of “The Sumerians” by Samuel
Noah Kramer ). Now the Sumerians did have a star that was
important in their religion and it was an EIGHT pointed star. Sometimes it was represented as a six pointed
star, which may have later influenced the Star of David used by the Jews. However, in terms of deities Nile seems to have done their better research and when
mentioned in the song “Die Rache Krieg Lied der Assyriche” Nergal is mentioned
as the “dread god of war and plague.”
This is a fairly accurate description of this god and I cannot fault Nile on this statement.
However, I can fault them on the fact that Nergal has no relation really
to Egyptian Mythology. However, the
developmental influence may have happened across the sea. Regardless Nergal is mentioned nowhere in
Egyptian mythology.
The
next topic I would like to discuss is the aspect of Evil used on the Nile album
and throughout the Necronomicon. This is
an extreme metal release so obviously Nile
would closer associate themselves with an evil nature rather than a benevolent
one. However in the linear notes on the
last page it quotes “Evil thanx from Nile
to.” While at first glance many would
think nothing of this, but then it occurred to me that the Egyptian religion is
fairly unique in the sense that it’s deities have both good and evil aspects to
them as if there is always a balance. I
found this interesting when I began to think about it because shouldn’t
technically Nile say “Neutral thanx” if they
would like to come off as being well read on the Egyptian religion? Furthermore the Necronomicon in itself is
held as a tome of “evil.” No matter how
inaccurate it actually is. I am saddened
and dismayed at Nile ’s choice to reference the
Necronomicon in their music for it makes them seem as if they are unwilling to
do the hard research, to make sure what they display as fact is indeed
fact. Nothing made me more furious than
Karl Sanders’ quote telling the world this was indeed Sumerian, when in fact it
was nothing near what Sumerian was in actuality. Now there are thousands of uninformed people
walking the earth proclaiming that Nile is a good reference, when in fact, if
Nile had done careful research on their own they would have seen the mockery in
itself.
I
must discuss my own personal outlook on the Necronomicon for a moment, because
I believe I have a very educated opinion on the subject, seeing as how I have
read a fair amount and studied Sumer quite a bit in my spare time. I once read a review of the Necronomicon and
the reviewer stated that the Bible and the Torah were works of fiction, but
they were based on fact. How could
things be any different for the Necronomicon?
This I believe was coming from someone who truly believed in the things
the Necronomicon claimed to raise, furthermore this person stated that he had
seen “things” that were unexplainable. Now
my question is that if the Bible and the Torah are works of fiction then why is
not the Necronomicon the biggest work of fiction of all? I see many people claiming such books of
power as “true,” yet they have no substantial works or historical background to
back them up. Now the Necronomicon tries
very hard to create that historical background for the reader, but reading any
literature on what Sumer
really is, any fool can see that the Necronomicon is an incredibly ignorant
work of fiction. I have heard people
claim that other books of power are also the oldest in magical works, yet when
presented with Pope Honorius
and Le Dragon Rouge these people know nothing of true books of power. Misinformation is very dangerous it is the
quickest and easiest way to forget the past.
I’m greatly disappointed in Nile ’s work
with this great concept. They came up
with a truly original and brilliant idea, but then dropped the ball during the
writing and research process. I am sad to
say this will get an overall poor rating, but I must do it. The music is great the information is
unforgivably erroneous.
Bibliography:
Black, Jeremy and Green,
Anthony. God’s Demons and Symbols of
Ancient Mesopotamia. Third University of Texas Press, Austin Texas ,
1997
Saggs, H.W.F. Babylonians . British
Museum Press, London , 1995
Thank you
ReplyDelete